Bones of giant Human beings, found all over the world. None are displayed or on record for this intriging find and discovery. No museum anywhere is taking any
interest or concern to include these phenomenal finds. WHich asks the question, why the cover up and neglect to publicly reveal and make it known? Is it really
to keep the darwinian story of evolution intact? Is it really threatened by giant bones? Does it validate the existence of "Golaith"'s battle
with young King David? If so, in what way does it alter or...motivate the need to hide these facts?
- PITT Announcements & Upcoming Events
- Introductions & Shout Outs
- General PITT Talk
- Photo Forum
- Urban Legends
- Investigations & Haunted Places
- Equipment, Data & Tech Talk
- Phenomena & The Strange
- Ideas, Thoughts & Theories
- Cryptozoology, Bigfoot & UFO's
- Weird News
- Psychic's Palette
- The Dream Diary
- All things Metaphysical
- Prayers, Thoughts and Good Juju vibes....
- The Media Market
- oBITCHuary
- This & That
- The Game Room
- Kicks & Giggles
- Wicked Weather Forum
- Computer Questions and Issues
- Test Forum
Bones of Giant Humans
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Nocturnz |
Bones of Giant Humans |
Lead | |
|
Registered User
Posts: 4 (08/01/08 02:36:22) |
|
||
|
privy2u |
|||
|
Knee deep in the PITT
Posts: 235 (08/01/08 18:18:42) Knee deep in the PITT |
Is there a website with info?
"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."
|
||
|
Nocturnz |
|||
|
Registered User
Posts: 4 (08/01/08 20:40:29) |
|||
|
Badger22 |
|||
|
Knee deep in the PITT
Posts: 1482 (08/05/08 09:59:01) The Wild, Weird and
|
I'm sorry, but I have a really difficult time with this type of web site. #1, they have a very obvious "axe to grind" - they would like to
disprove Darwin's theory of evolution, and they'll use almost any means to do it, including misrepresenting things. #2, almost every citation they
make is from the mid to late 19th century, and guess what was being discovered back then? Dinosaurs and prehistoric mega-fauna of North America, which has
more than once been mistaken for human remains. A mammalian leg bone tends to look like a lot of other mammalian leg bones, because that's what it
functions as, and unless you're very well versed in the differences between them, it wouldn't be at all difficult to mistake a prehistoric leg bone for
human, even if it's not really close once you've gotten familiar with the differences. And third, they're playing fast and loose with the facts.
Gigantopithecus is a very large ape, but it's native to Asia, not Australia. Meganthropus is another fossil that is apparently either
ape or early hominid, close enough to cause a lot of discussion - but again, it's native to Java, not Australia as cited in the web site. And the spcimens
are all in the 1 to 3 million year old range - well before modern homo sapiens came along.
Sometimes I think the world is going downhill. The rest of the time I'm a pessimist -- Me
|
||
|
Lorak777 |
|||
|
Knee deep in the PITT
Posts: 13203 (08/09/08 10:55:30) P.I.T.T. Case Mgr &
|
I would have to agree with Badger on this one. I think it's bogus.
May the forces of evil become confused on their way to your house.
|
||
|
privy2u |
|||
|
Knee deep in the PITT
Posts: 235 (08/11/08 22:47:35) Knee deep in the PITT |
I have some biblical stories rattling around in the deep caverns of my cranium about a Pre-Adamite world and similar stories. I'll share them another day
when I have a chance to meet the group face to face. Not saying any of it is fact, just an interesting slant or explanation of some of the mysteries of the
bible.
However, after pondering over all this dusty, tattered and otherwise idle information I can find only one thing in the memory banks that would explain the skeletal remains of giant beings. There is mention in the bible of angels coming to earth and taking wives. Apparently the angels were of large stature. This brief notation in scripture may be the spark that ignited the imagination of those authors quoted at the website. Regardless, I also agree with Badger on several points. At this point I consider it no more than an interesting topic among friends after several cocktails. "Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."
|
||
|
LokiArk |
|||
|
Becoming a Fixture
Posts: 33 (08/18/08 16:12:12) Newbie |
I have read articles in the past of "giant bones" being found within some of the mound builder sites in AR, OK and Mo. along with a few other
states. Some of these ended up in newspaper accounts in the 1800s. Note not all of the mounds were burial sites and many seemed to have astrological as well
as ceremonial uses. Desoto's journal of his journey here includes staying at one of these sites in Arkansas. There were stories passed down that seemed to
indicate a race of tall, light haired and eyed individuals that may have pre-dated or been present during the mound builders time. Maybe the Runestones in OK
and AR could be another indication of a Viking presence and they were a taller race.
I wouldn't discount the giant bones totally, after all we do have giants today don't we. What height constitutes a giant?, lol There is also the conspiracy theory that if a giant race was here before the other Indian races and acknowleged there would be legal turmoil over the implications. Not to mention quite a few embarassed Archeologists and Scientific Societies who are even now seeing the presence of man on this continent getting rolled back further and futher despite all their decades of hard work elaborating the impossibility.  Quote: |
||
|
Retrodork |
|||
|
Knee deep in the PITT
Posts: 1272 (08/21/08 11:28:33) PITT's Ectoplasmic Bookworm |
If I'm recalling it correctly, the larger stature angels were part of a caste known as the Grigori and the off-spring of their unions with mortal women
were known as Nephillim. I'm trying to look through my library to find the reference book, but considering the bogus slant on the site in question, I may
not look too intently. I'm with Badger on this one.
|
||
|
agfang |
Steven Quayle | ||
|
Knee deep in the PITT
Posts: 125 (10/30/08 21:49:26) Knee deep in the PITT |
One person who has been putting forward some of these theories is Steven Quayle. He is a researcher who has compiled a number of interesting news reports about
bodies of giants found around the world. Not all of these reports were from the turn of the 20th century, many of them are from the middle of the last century
and later. I won't hazard a guess about the veracity of his claims but he is an interesting speaker and seems to truly believe what he claims.
steve quayle website |
||
|
Badger22 |
|||
|
Knee deep in the PITT
Posts: 1482 (11/12/08 18:54:28) The Wild, Weird and
|
On the other hand, Richard Hoagland, the former NASA scientist who has made a career out of the 'Face on Mars', is also an interesting speaker and
firmly believes what he talks about - but I'm not going to hold my breath until the Martians finally decide to show up and tell us why they made a human
face on Mars. When someone starts talking about 30+ foot humans, I'm afraid my reaction is "Show me the bones".
Sometimes I think the world is going downhill. The rest of the time I'm a pessimist -- Me
|
||
- PITT Announcements & Upcoming Events
- Introductions & Shout Outs
- General PITT Talk
- Photo Forum
- Urban Legends
- Investigations & Haunted Places
- Equipment, Data & Tech Talk
- Phenomena & The Strange
- Ideas, Thoughts & Theories
- Cryptozoology, Bigfoot & UFO's
- Weird News
- Psychic's Palette
- The Dream Diary
- All things Metaphysical
- Prayers, Thoughts and Good Juju vibes....
- The Media Market
- oBITCHuary
- This & That
- The Game Room
- Kicks & Giggles
- Wicked Weather Forum
- Computer Questions and Issues
- Test Forum
Quick Reply
sidebar © ezdesign
